HomeThemesTypesDBAbout
Showing: ◈ ECHR×
The prime minister is considering tearing up the Human Rights Act and suspending the European Convention on Human Rights.
'Would we have won without immigration? No. Would we have won without...the NHS? All our research and the close result strongly suggests no. Would we have won by spending our time talking about trade and the single market? No way'
The former UKIPer said Brexit 2.0 would be getting Britain out of the European Court of Human Rights... like Russia.
'...it is a good time to take stock of the Gibraltar strand of Brexit and how that intertwines with the Brexit saga and, ultimately, to the extent that it does represent a certain kind of completion, a good time to take stock of Brexit itself.'
Legal experts condemn ‘disgraceful and illegal manipulation of system’.
The European Convention on Human Rights came into effect on 3 September 1953. Some people talk about the European Convention as if it was imposed on the unwilling British by our continental neighbours, but the reality may surprise you.
A key initiative in the Conservative Party’s 2015 manifesto was to repeal the Human Rights Act 1998. ... On 25 July 2016, a workshop was held at UCL to discuss these plans, and their implications in light of the UK’s new political environment post-Brexit.
Brexit has not only failed to deliver on its promise of reducing immigration and controlling borders, but it has also made the immigration issue worse and more difficult to manage. The government’s chaotic and ineffective immigration policies, such as the Rwanda policy, have only added to the problem.
Leo Varadkar warns that Brexit, aid cuts and talk of abandoning human rights treaty ‘not the Britain I know’.
We should remain within the ECHR to protect our legal rights.
‘Nothing less than the future of democracy is at stake’ says Caroline Lucas as a cross-party coalition and The Citizens win an unprecedented hearing over electoral safety and national security.
Cross-party group files claim to force inquiry into Russian interference in UK elections.
There remain "serious" differences between the UK and EU after the first round of trade talks, the bloc's chief negotiator has said.
Cross-party group says it will take action if PM fails to order independent investigation.
Cross-party group says government failed to investigate reported attempts to meddle in UK elections.
Proposal to replace Human Rights Act with bill of rights is effort to make government ‘untouchable’, say critics.
‘The UK has been taking three steps back from the original commitments,’ says EU negotiator.
With a potential trade war looming, Conservatives are stuck in an ever-more destructive disagreement over what Britain should look like outside the EU.
The former Tory minister and Brexiteer who quit parliament after a lobbying scandal is taking the government to the European courts – a judicial system he once loudly advocated leaving.
After Theresa May says Britain should leave the European convention on human rights, Patrick Stewart, Adrian Scarborough and Sarah Solemani expose the problems in the Conservative plan for a UK bill of rights.
The EU’s chief negotiator, Michel Barnier, was downbeat in his press conference after the conclusion of the talks.
Post-Brexit cooperation between the UK and the EU on law enforcement and criminal justice is sub-optimal, according to the House of Lords Justice and Home Affairs Committee.
There is a split within the Cabinet over the UK’s continued membership of the European Convention on Human Rights.
The good news last week is that the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has agreed to hear the case that there was Russian interference in the Brexit referendum. Several UK court cases, petitions and speeches in Parliament have failed to get the government to investigate and publish the result of the research into Russian interference.